Methods to reduce wildlife collisions with rail vehicles
| 1 | Politechnika Poznańska, Instytut Transportu, Polska |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Submission date: 2021-08-17
Final revision date: 2021-09-23
Acceptance date: 2021-10-12
Online publication date: 2021-10-14
Publication date: 2021-10-14
Rail Vehicles/Pojazdy Szynowe 2021,3,30–43
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The paper presents the problem of collisions of wild animals with oncoming trains. It explains the reasons for the presence of animals on tracks and describes potential threats to the environment and railroad traffic safety. In order to reduce the chance of an accident involving animals, different solutions are used: structural (that prevents animals from entering the tracks) and stimulus (that warns of an approaching train), as well as supporting methods that can increase the effectiveness of other means. The analysis of the results of studies carried out in various ecosystems around the world allowed to assess the effectiveness of the most popular methods of protecting fauna from collisions with vehicles and innovative solutions, considering the psychology of animals. Their application will allow to reach a compromise between development of transport networks, traffic safety and reduction of environmental impact.
REFERENCES (50)
1.
Andreassen H.P., Gundersen H., Storaas T.: The effect of scent? marking, forest clearing, and supplemental feeding on moose? train collisions. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 69, 2005. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-5....
2.
Babińska-Werka J., Krauze-Gryz D., Wasilewski M., Jasińska, K.: Effectiveness of an acoustic wildlife warning device using natural calls to reduce the risk of train collisions with animals. Transportation Research D, 38, 6–14, 2015.
3.
Backs J. A.J., Nychka J.A., St. Clair C.C.: Warning systems triggered by trains could reduce collisions with wildlife. Ecological Engineering, vol.106, Part A, 2017. https://doi.og/10.1016/j.ecole....
4.
Backs J. A.J., Nychka J.A., St. Clair C.C.: Warning systems triggered by trains increase flight-initiation times of wildlife, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 87, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.....
5.
Barrientos R., Borda-de-Água L.: Railways as Barriers for Wildlife: Current Knowledge. In: Borda-de-Água L., Barrientos R., Beja P., Pereira H. (eds) Railway Ecology. Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
6.
Barrientos R., Ascensão F., Beja P. Pereira H., Borda-de-Água L.: Railway ecology vs. road ecology: similarities and differences. Eur J Wildl Res 65, 12, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344....
7.
Bartoszek D., Stolarski M.: Kolizje pojazdów szynowych ze zwierzętami a bezpieczeństwo ruchu pociągów, Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej. Transport, t. 96, 49-58, 2013. bwmeta1.8c538381-3b33-4b4d-98fa-a57ff98fd2d0.
8.
Belant J. L.: Moose collisions with vehicles and trains in Northeastern Minnesota. Alces, 31, 1–8, 1995.
9.
Carvalho F., Santos S.M., Mira A., Lourenço R.: Methods to monitor and mitigate wildlife mortality in railways. In: Borda-de-Água L., Barrientos R., Beja P., Pereira H. (eds) Railway Ecology. Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
10.
Clevenger A. P., Waltho N.: Factors influencing the effectiveness of wildlife underpasses in Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada. Conservation Biology, 14, 47–56, 2000.
11.
Coraz więcej dzikich zwierząt ginie na torach https://regiony.rp.pl/trendy/2... (dostęp: 13.04.2021).
12.
Elmeros M., Winbladh J., Andersen P. N., Madsen A. B., & Christensen, J. T.: Effectiveness of odour repellents on red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): a field test. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 57(6), 1223-1226, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344....
13.
Eriksson C.: Does tree removal along railroads in Sweden influence the risk of trainaccidents with moose and roe deer? Dissertation, Second cycle, A2E. Grimsöoch Uppsala:SLU, Department of Ecology, Grimsö Wildlife Research Station.
14.
Gilhooly P. S., Nielsen S. E., Whittington J., and St. Clair C.C.: Wildlife mortality on roads and railways following highway mitigation. Ecosphere 10(2):e02597. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2....
15.
Gilsdorf J.M., Hygnstrom S.E., VerCauteren Kurt C.: Use of frightening devices in wildlife damage management. USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications, 227, 2013. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu....
16.
Iuell, B. et al.: Wildlife and Traffic: A European Handbook for Identifying Conflicts and Designing Solutions. Brusel, KNNV Publishers, 2003.
17.
Jackson, S. D., & Griffin, C. R.: A strategy for mitigating highway impacts on wildlife. In T. A. Messmer B. West (eds.) Wildlife and highways: Seeking solutions to an ecologicaland socio-economic dilemma, Bethesda: The Wildlife Society, 2000.
18.
Japan builds turtles their tunnels to help them cross rail tracks https://www.lifegate.com/japan... (dostęp: 13.04.2021).
19.
Japanese rail workers build special tunnels to save turtles from train deaths https://www.independent.co.uk/... (dostęp: 13.04.2021).
20.
Jasińska K. D., Bijak S., Child K. N., Rea R. V.: Wzorce czasowe kolizji łosi z pociągami na terenie Kolumbii Brytyjskiej i ich wpływ na metody zapobiegające takim zdarzeniom. Sylwan, 164 (1), 32? 40, 2020. https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwa....
21.
Jasińska K., Werka J., Krauze? Gryz D., Wasilewski M.: Urządzenia akustyczne UOZ? 1 sposobem na ograniczenie kolizji z udziałem zwierząt na liniach kolejowych. Sylwan, 158 (2), 143? 150, 2014.
22.
Kossak S., Zasada działania atrapy bodźców kluczowych zastosowanej w urządzeniu UOZ-1 wypłaszającym zwierzęta z torów kolei szybkiego ruchu. W: Oddziaływanie infrastruktury transportowej na przestrzeń przyrodniczą. Red. B. Jackowiak Warszawa – Poznań – Lublin: 173–179, 2007.
23.
Kowal P., Jasińska K., Babińska-Werka J.: Aktywne metody ochrony zwierząt wzdłuż linii kolejowych na obszarach Europejskiej Sieci Ekologicznej Natura 2000. Przegląd Naukowy Inżynieria i Kształtowanie Środowiska, 22 (4), 463-471, 2013.
24.
Krauze-Gryz D., Żmihorski M., Jasińska K., Kwaśny Ł., Werka J.: Temporal pattern of wildlife-train collisions in Poland. Journal of wildlife management, 81(8), 1513-1519, 2017.
25.
Kušta T., Ježek M., Keken Z.; Mortality of large mammals on railway tracks. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 42, 12–18, 2011.
26.
Kušta T., Keken Z., Ježek M., & Kůta Z.: Effectiveness and costs of odor repellents inwildlife-vehicle collisions: A case study in Central Bohemia, Czech Republic. TransportationResearch Part D, 38,1–5, 2015.
27.
Mastro L. L., Conover M.R., Frey S. N.: Deer–vehicle collision prevention techniques. Human–Wildlife Interactions. 75, 2008. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu....
28.
Nowak S., Mysłajek R.W.: Propozycja metodyki podstawowego monitoringu użytkowania przejść dla zwierząt przez ssaki naziemne. Studia i Materiały CEPL w Rogowie, 21 (59), 14-23, 2019.
29.
Phokharatkul P., Liswadiratanakul D.: Using the vibration sensors to detect elephants, Kasem Bundit Engineering Journal, 8, 260-270, 2018. https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/in....
30.
] Przepusty dla zwierząt przy liniach kolejowych. Ciekawostki. Za: PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A. https://inzynierbudownictwa.pl... (dostęp 13.04.2021).
31.
Putman R.J., Langbein J., Staines B.W.: Deer and Road Traffic Accidents: A Review of Mitigation Measures: Costs and Cost-Effectiveness, Report for the Deer Commission for Scotland, Contract RP23A, UK, 2004.
32.
Roy M., Sukumar R.: Railways and Wildlife: A Case Study of Train-Elephant Collisions in Northern West Bengal, India. In: Borda-de-Água L., Barrientos R., Beja P., Pereira H. (eds) Railway Ecology. Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
33.
Sahlsten J., Bunnefeld N., Månsson J., Ericsson G., Bergström R., Dettki H.: Can supplementary feeding be used to redistribute moose Alces alces?, Wildlife Biology, 16(1), 85-92, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2981/08-085.
34.
Santos S.M., Carvalho F., Mira A.: Current Knowledge on Wildlife Mortality in Railways. In: Borda-de-Água L., Barrientos R., Beja P., Pereira H. (eds) Railway Ecology. Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
35.
Sarma U. K., Easa P. S., Menon V.: Deadly lines: A scientific approach to understanding and mitigating elephant mortality due to train hits in Assam. Occasional Report no. 24, New Delhi: Wildlife Trust of India, 2006.
36.
Seiler A., Olsson M.: Wildlife Deterrent Methods for Railways—An Experimental Study. In: Borda-de-Água L., Barrientos R., Beja P., Pereira H. (eds) Railway Ecology. Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
37.
Shimura M., Ushiogi T., Ikehata M.: Development of an acoustic deterrent to prevent deer-train collisions. Quart. Report RTRI 59, 207–211, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr....
38.
Singh A. K., Kumar A., Mookerjee A., Menon V.: Jumbo express: A scientific approach to understanding and mitigating elephant mortality due to train accidents in Rajaji National Park. Occasional Report no. 3, New Delhi: Wildlife Trust of India, 2001.
39.
St. Clair C.C., Backs J., Friesen A., Gangadharan A., Gilhooly P., Murray M., Pollock S.: Animal learning may contribute to both problems and solutions for wildlife–train collisions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 374: 20180050, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb....
40.
Stolarski M., Żyłkowska J.: Wypadki z udziałem zwierząt w transporcie kolejowym, Transport i Komunikacja, 3, 26-28, 2014.
41.
Stolarski M., Żyłkowska J.: Aktywne metody ochrony zwierząt na liniach kolejowych, Technika Transportu Szynowego 5-6, 2008.
42.
Stolarski M., Żyłkowska J.: Ochrona zwierząt jako istotny element procesu inwestycyjnego podczas budowy i modernizacji linii kolejowych. Problemy Kolejnictwa, 153, 2011.
43.
Stolarski M., Pielech M.; Metody powiązania urządzeń sterowania ruchem kolejowym z systemem ochrony zwierząt UOZ-1. Logistyka, 3, 2012. bwmeta1.BPGA-0001-0041.
44.
Stolarski M.: Urządzenia do odstraszania zwierząt UOZ-1 dla linii kolejowych o dużych prędkościach ruchu pociągu. In: Jackowiak B. (eds) Oddziaływanie infrastruktury transportowej na przestrzeń przyrodniczą, 181-187, 2007. bwmeta1.BGPK-2072-7786.
45.
Visintin C., Golding N., van der Ree R., McCarthy M. A:. Managing the timing and speed of vehicles reduces wildlife-transport collision risk. Transportation research part D: Transport and Environment, 59, 86-95, 2018. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2....
46.
Wildlife-Vehicle Collision Reduction Study: Report to Congress, 2018. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publi... (dostęp 13.04.2021).
47.
[47} Wojtynek L., Kulińska E., Budzik R., Kulińska A.: Wypadki z udziałem zwierząt w transporcie drogowym i kolejowym w Polsce. Autobusy: technika, eksploatacja, systemy transportowe, 18 (6), 1460-1463, 2017.
48.
Wood J., O'Connell-Rodwell C., Klempere, S.: Using Seismic Sensors to Detect Elephants and Other Large Mammals: A Potential Census Technique. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42(3), 587-594, 2005. http://www.jstor.org/stable/35....
49.
Żyłkowska J.: Ochrona fauny w korytarzach transportowych, metody alternatywne wobec przejść dla zwierząt. Logistyka, 3, 2012. www.bwmeta1.BUS8-0024-0033.
50.
Żyłkowska J. Stolarski M.: Problematyka kolizji dzikich zwierząt z pociągami w aspekcie psychologii zwierząt oraz bezpieczeństwa ruchu pociągów. Logistyka, 3, 2011. bwmeta1.BPL1-0007-0038.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.